|
Iraq's new leader was a terrorist. And we paid him to kill.
|
|
By Mike Cuenca | June 28, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
Even as we're having to accept that our government has perhaps
authorized torture, now we have to face more evidence of the
possibility that our government has also knowingly sponsored terrorism.
When the U.S. handed over "sovereignty" to the Iraqi Governing Council
on June 28, they gave the reins to Iyad Allawi, who early in June, the
Bush administration had appointed as the new prime minister of Iraq.
According to a recent article in the New York Times, "several former
intelligence officials" say that during the 1990s Allawi was head of an
anti-Saddam terrorism group that was sponsored by the CIA. The article
in the Times was published June 8, 2004 and was titled "THE REACH OF
WAR: NEW PREMIER; Ex-C.I.A. Aides Say Iraq Leader Helped Agency in 90's
Attacks."
According to the article, the group detonated "car bombs and other
explosive devices" in Baghdad. During that time period, according to
the article, the Iraqi government claimed that one bomb exploded in a
movie theater, killing civilians.
My favorite quote in the article is attributed to "an American
intelligence officer who worked with Dr. Allawi in the early 1990's."
The intelligence officer is quoted as saying that "no one had any
problem with sabotage in Baghdad back then." I don't think that's true.
I'm sure that many Americans, if asked, would have objected. I know I would have.
According to the article, Allawi was a former Baath Party member who
founded an anti-Saddam group in 1990 with Salih Omar Ali al-Tikriti, a
man who was so reprehensible even to the CIA that they refused to work
with Allawi unless he "severed his relationship with Tikriti."
Considering that the article said Allawi has a history of espionage,
sabotage, and deception, one must wonder how they could trust that he
truly did "sever" the relationship with Tikriti.
So now we can say we deposed a dictator and imposed a known terrorist
in Iraq. Allawi's terrorist attacks may have been against Saddam
Hussein, but it was still terrorism. And if we paid for it, we're all
responsible. If we remain silent, we're duplicitous.
On some days, it's hard to be proud of our country.
|
|
|