|
Sure, he doesn't think pay inequity is a problem. He benefits.
|
|
By Cynthia Annett | March 2, 2002
|
|
|
|
|
I am just a woman, which probably explains my problem with math and
economics. You see, I never understood that 66% equals 100%! I never
understood that because I'm a woman, my PhD from Cal-Berkeley is
supposed to be worth 34% less than the same degrees earned by men.
But now that it's been brought to my attention, I want to know why one
car on the lot doesn't cost 34% less than the apparently identical car
next to it, when one might have been made on an assembly line that
included women, while the other was made by an all male assembly line.
I want to know why one television set doesn't cost 34% more than the
one next to it on the shelf because it has the sticker on the box that
says "Made by Men". I want to know why stocks bought and sold by women
stockbrokers don't cost 34% less than those bought and sold by male
stockbrokers. I want to know why an education provided by women
professors doesn't cost 34% less in tuition. All this time I
hadn't realized that the reason men who think like Al Lane don't see a
problem with pay inequity is because they are better at economics than
women. Men don't see a problem with pay inequity because they're shrewd
enough to realize that under the current system, it's like men are all
buying goods and services at a 34% discount compared with the buying
power of women. All this time I had worried that something
more significant was wrong with my country. I had worried that the
definition of "democracy" had been changed. I had worried that my
dictionary was out of date, that the new editions no longer defined
democracy as "The principles of social equality and respect for the
individual within a community". I was worried that there's no equality
in this country after all. Now I understand that all along it was
merely my female lack of understanding of economics. But now
that I do understand all this, I have a suggestion for how Chancellor
Hemenway could cut KU's budget by 34%: hire all women!
|
|
|